{"id":10340,"date":"2020-02-28T19:18:03","date_gmt":"2020-02-28T08:18:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/?p=10340"},"modified":"2023-02-09T14:47:37","modified_gmt":"2023-02-09T03:47:37","slug":"should-an-smsf-have-a-tenants-in-common-agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/investments\/should-an-smsf-have-a-tenants-in-common-agreement\/","title":{"rendered":"Should an SMSF have a tenants in common agreement?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Should<\/p>\n

Introduction<\/h3>\n

Real estate is a common and popular investment for SMSFs. Indeed, the ATO’s SMSF statistical report for the quarter ended 30 September 2019 shows that SMSFs held around $35 billion in residential real property and around $64.6 billion in non-residential property, ie, around $99.6 billion worth of real property.<\/p>\n

It is also reasonably popular for SMSF trustees to hold property with others to increase the funds available to invest and to minimise risk. However, it is important that each SMSF trustee is aware of the pros and cons of co-investment and the consequences that may arise when things don\u2019t go as planned or if a disposal or exit from a jointly held investment is needed.<\/p>\n

An SMSF trustee will usually hold a part interest in real estate as tenants in common with the other co\u2011owners and as such a tenants in common agreement (\u2018TIC Agreement\u2019) is recommended to place the relationship at arm\u2019s length. A TIC Agreement also provides greater certainty and can minimise the risk of costly and protracted disputes.<\/p>\n

This article explains some key considerations that should be reflected in a TIC Agreement.<\/p>\n

What can go wrong?<\/h3>\n

Many things can happen to a person, company or trustee of a trust (or the persons controlling such an entity) that could cause problems for other co-owners. This can include the co-owner or their controllers:<\/p>\n