{"id":10740,"date":"2020-04-28T19:12:19","date_gmt":"2020-04-28T09:12:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/?p=10740"},"modified":"2021-08-25T22:07:53","modified_gmt":"2021-08-25T12:07:53","slug":"why-is-katz-v-grossman-different-to-wareham-v-marsella","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/succession-planning\/why-is-katz-v-grossman-different-to-wareham-v-marsella\/","title":{"rendered":"Why is Katz v Grossman different to Wareham v Marsella?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"WhyThe Victorian Court of Appeal recently handed down Wareham v Marsella<\/em> [2020] VSCA 92<\/a>. This judgement represents the appeal of Marsella v Wareham (No 2)<\/em> [2019] VSC 65<\/a>. You can read our article about Wareham v Marsella<\/em> here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Many have questioned why the outcome in Wareham v Marsella<\/em> is so different to Katz v Grossman <\/em>[2005] NSWSC 934. However, the difference in outcome is not surprising because these cases deal with quite separate issues. This article explains how these cases differ.<\/p>\n

Katz v Grossman <\/em>facts and findings<\/h3>\n

This case involved a dispute between a brother (Daniel Katz) and a sister (Linda Grossman) over who technically were the trustees and members of their deceased parents\u2019 super fund (and therefore who had control over their deceased father\u2019s $1 million plus benefit).<\/p>\n

Prior to their deaths, the father (Ervin Katz) and the mother (Evelin Katz) were the trustees and members of the fund. After his wife\u2019s death, Ervin appointed Linda as the other trustee of the fund on 18 March 1999 relying on the powers conferred upon him by the Trustee Act 1925<\/em> (NSW) (\u2018TA\u2019).<\/p>\n

On 19 September 2003 Ervin died. Probate was not obtained until 5 August 2004 (probate was granted to his son and his daughter).<\/p>\n

Shortly after Ervin\u2019s death, Linda appointed her husband (Peter Grossman) as trustee of the fund on 5 December 2003. Linda had refused to follow her late father\u2019s non-binding nomination (an equal sharing between her and her brother Daniel).<\/p>\n

Daniel argued that Linda had not been validly appointed as trustee as Erwin did not have the authority to do so because:<\/p>\n