{"id":5591,"date":"2015-03-31T14:38:53","date_gmt":"2015-03-31T03:38:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/?p=5591"},"modified":"2015-04-02T09:54:54","modified_gmt":"2015-04-01T22:54:54","slug":"how-to-benchmark-related-party-lrbas-when-a-bank-wont-lend-including-where-buying-a-reg-13-22c-unit-trust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/limited-recourse-borrowing-arrangements\/how-to-benchmark-related-party-lrbas-when-a-bank-wont-lend-including-where-buying-a-reg-13-22c-unit-trust\/","title":{"rendered":"How to benchmark related party LRBAs when a bank won’t lend \u2026 including where buying a reg 13.22C unit trust!"},"content":{"rendered":"
Related parties can lend to SMSFs. However, it is critical to watch out for non-arm\u2019s length income. The solution is to benchmark. But how do you benchmark in situations where banks won\u2019t lend? This is particularly an issue where the asset being acquired is units in a reg 13.22C unit trust.<\/p>\n
I have a solution! (Naturally, this solution is subject to an important disclaimer: see below.)<\/p>\n
Late last year, the ATO released two interpretive decisions of what not<\/em> to do: ATO ID 2014\/39 and ATO ID 2014\/40. The SMSFs in both of these ATO IDs ended up with non-arm\u2019s length income.<\/p>\n The ATO then clarified on their website:<\/p>\n To be able to demonstrate that NALI does not arise, a fund trustee entering into an LRBA with a related-party borrower should obtain and keep documentation that enables them to establish that the terms of the loan, taken together, and the ongoing operation of the loan are consistent with what an arm\u2019s length lender dealing at arm\u2019s length would accept in relation to the particular borrowing by the fund trustee.<\/p>\n In short, the ATO seem to want benchmarking. Naturally, this makes sense.<\/p>\n The gold standard no doubt is to go to a bank \u2014 or even a number of banks \u2014 and get a written quote for the interest rates, loan-to-value ratio and other terms that the bank would use when lending. Then, ideally one should replicate those terms in the related party loan.<\/p>\n However, there are certain instances where banks simply won\u2019t lend to an SMSF. This is not because it is prohibited for SMSFs to borrow in such circumstances. Rather, it seems to be more to do with banks\u2019 conservative policies.<\/p>\n Two common situations are as follows:<\/p>\n (For completeness, I do acknowledge that sometimes a bank will lend in these circumstances. However, that is so rare that \u2014 if you will forgive the bad pun \u2014 we should not \u2018bank on it\u2019.)<\/p>\n Naturally, if the interest rate is right an arm\u2019s length party will lend in these circumstances, but what is that \u2018right\u2019 interest rate and how do you prove it?<\/p>\n My co-director Daniel Butler and I regularly present SMSF Strategy Seminars all around the country to some of the top SMSF advisers. In February\u2013March 2015 we presented 15 such SMSF Strategy Seminars, both for DBA Network Pty Ltd and for CPA Australia.<\/p>\n In these seminars we administered the following survey:<\/p>\n You receive legal advice that if you exercised your mortgagee powers in respect of the tenants in common interest in the real estate, you could probably easily obtain a partitioning order by sale under which you can force the co-owner to sell at auction their half along with your half and then you split the proceeds.<\/em><\/p>\n SCENARIO 2: BORROWING TO ACQUIRE UNITS IN A UNIT TRUST<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Facts<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The trustee of a completely arm\u2019s length, unrelated SMSF asks you to lend to it in the following circumstances under an LRBA:<\/em><\/p>\n\n
The solution<\/h3>\n
\n\n
\n Asset being acquired<\/td>\n a 50% tenants in common interest in real estate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Personal guarantees<\/td>\n Yes: from both SMSF members (at least one owns a valuable, unencumbered home)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Mortgage granted over asset SMSF acquiring<\/td>\n Yes (over the asset being acquired)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Amount being borrowed<\/td>\n $1.5 million<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Length of loan<\/td>\n 15 years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Type of loan<\/td>\n Principal & interest<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n LVR<\/td>\n 100%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n