{"id":8983,"date":"2018-11-13T18:28:03","date_gmt":"2018-11-13T07:28:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/?p=8983"},"modified":"2023-02-09T14:28:16","modified_gmt":"2023-02-09T03:28:16","slug":"the-new-ipso-facto-regime-and-smsfs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dbalawyers.com.au\/investments\/the-new-ipso-facto-regime-and-smsfs\/","title":{"rendered":"The new \u2018ipso facto\u2019 regime and SMSFs"},"content":{"rendered":"
Daniel Butler<\/strong> (dbutler@dbalawyers.com.au<\/a>), Director, DBA Lawyers <\/em><\/p>\n The new law pertaining to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses came into operation on 1 July 2018. This article highlights the relevance of the new law for SMSFs. Note that the law in this area is complex and a detailed and careful analysis is required to properly understand how the new \u2018ipso facto\u2019 regime operates.<\/p>\n \u2018Ipso facto\u2019 is a Latin phrase that means \u2018by the fact itself\u2019. An \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clause is a provision in a contract that allows one party to terminate or modify the operation of a contract upon the occurrence of some specific event, regardless of otherwise continued performance of the counterparty. For example, in an insolvency context, a clause in a lease that allows one party to terminate the lease if the counterparty enters into external administration is an \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clause.<\/p>\n For the counterparty that is affected by an insolvency or formal restructure process, some negative consequences of \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses include (but are not limited to) the following:<\/p>\n The introduction of the new law relating to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses is part of the Federal government\u2019s reform of Australia\u2019s insolvency laws. This new law is aimed at enabling businesses to continue to trade in order to recover from an insolvency event.<\/p>\n Broadly, this new law applies to contracts entered into on or after 1 July 2018 and makes certain \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses that amend or terminate a contract unenforceable if the \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clause is triggered merely because:<\/p>\n Generally, where a triggering event under any of the above mentioned three categories occurs, there is a \u2018stay on enforcing rights\u2019. Please note that there is further detail in each relevant section of the CA, covering aspects such as the timing of the stay and the Court\u2019s ability to extend the period of the stay. However, a detailed examination of these sections is beyond the scope and purpose of this article.<\/p>\n Note also that there also exists exceptions to a \u2018stay on enforcing rights\u2019. We summarise these exceptions into four categories:<\/p>\n Where a party wishes to enforce their rights despite a stay, they can apply for a court order. Broadly, the Court may issue an order if the Court is satisfied that this is appropriate in the interests of justice. (Refer to the CA ss\u00a0415E, 434K, 451F for further details about the criteria that the Court considers before making an order).<\/p>\n Despite the operation of a \u2018stay on enforcing rights\u2019, the new law does not prohibit the exercise of a right for any other reason. For example, where there is a breach involving non-payment or non-performance by one party, the counterparty party can pursue its legal rights.<\/p>\n While the new law relating to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses is not specifically targeted at SMSFs, it is relevant since there are an increasing number of SMSFs, especially SMSFs with corporate trustees, and these SMSFs often enter into various contracts that may contain \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses. The following are some common scenarios:<\/p>\n Naturally, there are many other scenarios where an SMSF may enter into a contract.<\/p>\n In the first scenario, the lease may contain provisions stating that the lease agreement is terminated if the tenant enters into administration or the tenant fails to make a lease payment within a prescribed time period. Similarly, in the second scenario, the loan agreement may contain provisions stating that the loan agreement is terminated if the borrower enters into administration or the borrower fails to make a loan repayment within a prescribed time period. In both the first and second scenarios, the SMSF trustee may seek to rely on these provisions to terminate the agreement with the other party on the occurrence of a triggering event.<\/p>\n In the third scenario, the LRBA documents may contain provisions stating that the loan agreement is terminated if a certain triggering events occur, such as if the SMSF trustee enters into administration or the SMSF trustee fails to make a loan repayment within a prescribed time period. In the third scenario, the third party may try to rely on the provisions against the SMSF trustee upon the occurrence of a triggering event. In all three scenarios, there may be other clauses that deal with the consequence of the termination. It is important for SMSF trustees and advisers to know whether such clauses can be relied upon if a certain triggering event occurs. In certain circumstances, they may also have to decide whether any documents need to be updated in light of the new law relating to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses.<\/p>\n The following is a brief checklist of questions for SMSF trustees and advisers to consider when reviewing contracts.<\/p>\n For completeness, please note that a \u2018stay on enforcing rights\u2019 relating to an \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clause does not by itself invalidate a contract. Furthermore, the law in relation to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses may be subject to further change in the future. For example, the exceptions to \u2018stay on enforcing rights\u2019 may change, so it is prudent to review the law on a regular basis.<\/p>\n SMSF trustees and advisers should review all contracts entered into on or after 1 July 2018. SMSF trustees should also obtain documentation (such as LRBA documentation) from a quality supplier firm that has reviewed its documentation to ensure that it is up-to-date in light of this new law in relation to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses.<\/p>\n The law in relation to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses is a new area of law and where in doubt, expert advice should be obtained. Naturally, for advisers, the Australian financial services licence under the CA and tax advice obligations under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009<\/em> (Cth) need to be appropriately managed to ensure advice is appropriately and legally provided.<\/p>\n DBA Lawyers offers a range of consulting services in relation to individuals and advisers who have queries about how an \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clause affects an SMSF. DBA Lawyers also offers a wide range of document services. DBA Lawyers also confirms that its LRBA documentation has been reviewed to ensure that it is up-to-date in light of the new law relating to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses.<\/p>\n Related articles and links below:<\/p>\n *\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 *<\/p>\n Note: DBA Lawyers hold SMSF CPD training at venues all around. For more details or to register, visit www.dbanetwork.com.au<\/a> or call 03 9092 9400.<\/p>\n For more information regarding how DBA Lawyers can assist in your SMSF practice.<\/p>\n Daniel Butler (dbutler@dbalawyers.com.au), Director, DBA Lawyers The new law pertaining to \u2018ipso facto\u2019 clauses came into operation on 1 July 2018. This article highlights the relevance of the new law for SMSFs. Note that the law in this area is complex and a detailed and careful analysis is required to properly understand how the new [read more<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":8985,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,31,35,38],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[138],"yoast_head":"\nBackground: Purpose of the new law <\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
Summary of the new law <\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
\n
Relevance of the new law for SMSFs<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Related articles<\/h3>\n
\n