ATO issues TRIS confirmation of key commutation strategy
The ATO in SMSFD 2013/2 confirmed that an account-based pension can be partially commuted to a lump sum to enable a member to take advantage of their low rate cap. (The low rate cap for the 2014/15 financial year is $185,000). However, the ATO in paragraph 11 of this SMSF determination stated:
11. This Determination does not apply to an account based pension that is a ‘transition to retirement income stream’ …
Thus, the ATO has until very recently had no confirmation on whether a member with a TRIS could implement this strategy.
However, the ATO updated the TRIS information on its web page (http://www.ato.gov.au/Super/Super-professionals/In-detail/Transition-to-retirement/SMSF—transition-to-retirement-income-streams/ ‘ATO TRIS Page’) on 18 September to confirm that to the extent that a member has unrestricted non-preserved benefits (‘UNPB’) funding their TRIS, they can also partially commute such an amount to take advantage of their low rate cap.
Why is utilising the low rate cap advantageous?
Kerry is 57 years old with a $500,000 TRIS with a 100% taxable component. The TRIS interest is comprised of a $250,000 preserved amount and $250,000 of UNPBs. Kerry is on the top tax rate of 45%, plus the 2% Medicare levy and is also subject to the Temporary Budget Repair levy of 2% to the extent her taxable income exceeds $180,000. Thus, Kerry currently pays 49% on every $1.00 earned in tax; leaving her 51 cents out of each hard earned dollar. (Assume Kerry is on the top rate of tax even if she did not receive any TRIS payment.)
Kerry must be paid at least the minimum annual amount each financial year by the trustee of the fund providing her TRIS under regulation 1.06(9A) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision Regulations 1994 (Cth) (‘SISR’). In particular, reg 1.06(9A)(a) provides:
(a) for a pension in relation to which there is an account balance attributable to the beneficiary — the total of payments in any year … is at least the amount calculated under clause 1 of Schedule 7; [Emphasis added].
The ATO confirmed in SMSFD 2013/2 that the ‘total of payments in any year’ includes a payment made as a result of a partial commutation of an account-based pension (other than a TRIS) under reg 1.06(9A)(a).
The ATO TRIS Page from 18 September 2014 now also confirms:
Restrictions on withdrawals from a TRIS do not prevent you from paying a member all or part of their unrestricted non-preserved benefits. When a member has unrestricted non-preserved benefits as part of their TRIS, they may partially commute the TRIS and receive a lump sum payment up to the amount of their unrestricted non-preserved benefits.
A partial commutation is evidenced by the member making an election before a particular payment is made under reg 995-1.03 of the Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 (Cth) (‘ITAR 1997’). Broadly, this election results in the amount that would otherwise be taxed as a pension, to be taxed as a lump sum.
Where the election can be used, it is very powerful. It means that:
- At the super fund level, the payment still counts towards satisfying the minimum pension requirements.
- At the recipient level, the payment is taxed as a lump sum not as a pension payment. Thus, the first $185,000 (for the 2014/15 financial year) of the taxable component can be received tax free pursuant to low rate cap amount in s 301-20 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth).
Kerry, could, for example, elect to receive $20,000 ($500,000 x 4% = $20,000) of her TRIS tax free as it would be part of her low rate cap.
However, Kerry may wish to increase the amount withdrawn from her TRIS given it is tax free.
Usually, a 10% maximum payment applies to a TRIS each financial year. However, this 10% cap does not apply to a commuted amount. Thus, Kerry could withdraw the total amount of $185,000 tax free from her TRIS if she wanted to exhaust her lifetime low rate cap.
Thus, Kerry can withdraw $185,000 tax free and this saves 32% in tax and Medicare levy since it is covered by the low rate cap (ie, 47% – 15% pension tax offset). However, a non-refundable tax offset, such as the low rate cap, cannot be used to reduce the 2% Temporary Budget Repair Levy. Kerry, will therefore pay $3,700 (ie, $185,000 x 2% = $3,700) rather than $62,900 (ie, $185,000 x 34% = $62,900); a saving of $59,200.
The ATO TRIS Page states:
When working out whether you have stayed below the maximum annual pension payment limit, you ignore any payments you made as a result of any commutation of the TRIS.
This is in accordance with reg 6.01 of the SISR which, in the definition of TRIS states:
(ii) allows total payments (excluding payments by way of commutation, …) made in a financial year to amount to no more than 10% of the annuity account balance. [Emphasis added].
Also, an election must be made under reg 995-1.03 of the ITAR.
We have made a template of such an election. To obtain the template for free, please email me at [email protected] with ‘reg 995-1.03 election’ in the subject line.
Is it wise to commence a TRIS with unrestricted non-preserved benefits?
The advantage of having UNPBs is that no further condition of release needs to be satisfied before accessing such amounts from a superannuation fund. However, an applicable condition of release needs to be satisfied before accessing preserved amounts.
A little known quirk here in the preservation rules can have important implications for clients. While reg 6.22A(2) provides a general rule that amounts from a super fund generally be paid firstly from UNPBs, secondly from restricted non-preserved benefits and thirdly from preserved benefits, a super fund trustee can ‘cherry pick’ what amounts are applied towards the funding of a pension. Broadly, it is possible to only apply preserved amounts towards funding a TRIS. This leaves UNPBs to be maintained for easy access; such as for the payment of a lump sum or the commencement of an account-based pension.
The article ‘Preservation rules — a little known quirk and how to use it for clients to cherry pick’ by Bryce Figot, Director, of DBA Lawyers explains how this quirk arises, its legislative basis and then how to use it to advantage clients.
Can a commuted amount be paid in kind (ie, in-specie)?
The ATO has long held the view that a pension cannot be paid in kind. Thus, this raises the question of whether a payment of an amount that is partially commuted can be paid in kind.
In SMSFD 2013/2 regarding an account-based pension, the ATO stated:
Further, the partial commutation payment is a lump sum for the purposes of the SISR 1994 and counts regardless of whether the payment is made in cash or in specie.
The ATO TRIS Page also now confirms this:
- the payment can be made by way of an asset transfer, known as an in-specie payment.
Recall above that an election is needed for a commuted pension amount to be converted to a lump sum. Thus, the ATO have now confirmed that a partial commutation of both an account-based pension and TRIS can be made in kind (eg, by the transfer of assets of an equivalent market value).
What about full commutations?
The ATO are comfortable with an amount that results from a partial commutation being able to be converted to a lump sum. However, the ATO position differs in respect of a full commutation of an account-based pension or a TRIS. Broadly, the ATO’s view is that on full commutation, the pension ceases in accordance with TR 2013/5.
In SMSFD 2013/2 the ATO state:
As the payment of the commutation lump sum is made after the cessation of the account based pension it cannot count towards the minimum annual payment requirement set out in paragraph 1.06(9A)(a) of the SISR 1994.
The ATO TRIS Page states:
A TRIS ceases when a member’s request to fully commute their entitlement to a TRIS for an entitlement to a lump sum takes effect.
Thus, be mindful that a full commutation (where a pension ceases) must be considered differently to a partial commutation. Under a partial commutation, the pension continues.
Satisfying a condition of release while paying a TRIS
The ATO TRIS Page confirms:
Satisfying a condition of release with a ‘nil’ cashing restriction means that the pension is no longer subject to the following restrictions generally characteristic of a TRIS:
- The maximum annual pension payment limit no longer applies
- Some of the commutation restrictions that affect a TRIS will cease to apply
However, quality documentation is required for these restrictions to ‘fall away’ and not apply. The key documents here are the governing rules of an SMSF and the TRIS documents. DBA Lawyers’ provide such documents that are consistent with implementing the above strategies and much more. In particular, our TRIS Kit automatically converts to an account-based pension on the member satisfying a condition of release with a ‘nil’ cashing restriction. Many other suppliers’ documents are unduly restrictive and a variation is generally required to ‘unshackle’ these TRIS restrictions.
This ATO clarification is welcome news for many and gives a tremendous boost to a number of key TRIS strategies!
* * *
This article is for general information only and should not be relied upon without first seeking advice from an appropriately qualified professional.