Payday Super and SMSFs

By Daniel Butler, Nick Walker on 31/03/2026 in ATO, Contributions, SMSF compliance, Taxation, Trustee education

The Payday Super (PDS) regime requires employers to pay superannuation guarantee (SG) contributions at the same time as they pay salary and wages from 1 July 2026. Further, these SG contributions must be received by the relevant superannuation fund within 7-business days.

This article focuses on the key risks and considerations for employers who make SG contributions to SMSFs as well as what SMSFs trustees must do to be ready for PDS.

For more of an overview of how PDS works, see our article here:

Employer risk when dealing with SMSFs

The ATO recently published its quarterly statistical report for December 2025 which confirmed that there were:

663,867 SMSFs
1,224,936 SMSF members

These numbers have significantly increased in recent years.

Under the choice of fund regime (see here) employees may choose to have their SG contributed to a superannuation fund of their choice, including an SMSF. Indeed, it is becoming increasingly popular for employers to contribute to an employee’s SMSF. ATO figures show that there were some 244,000 SMSFs receiving SG contributions for 366,000 employees via single touch payroll (STP).

An employer wears additional risk when contributing to an SMSF as compared to a large industry fund due to factors such as:

an SMSF’s details might be withheld if it lodges its annual statutory return late;
an SMSF may change its bank account details; or
an SMSF may be rendered non-complying.

Where one or more of these issues occurs, the SMSF may be unable to receive SG contributions. This creates flow-on issues for employers who are still required to satisfy their PDS obligations.

The ATO statistical report also confirmed that the demographic profile of new SMSF members is changing to a younger cohort. Among new entrants, 39.1% are aged between 35-44 and 18.5% are aged between 45-49 – overall nearly seven in ten new members are under 50, compared to an estimated ~25% of the existing SMSF population.

A key ATO concern regarding SMSFs in recent years has been the potential for SMSFs to be used for illegal early access. The ATO recently issued a warning that “some people may say they can help you set up an SMSF so you can access your super for reasons such as paying off your credit card, buying a house or to go on a holiday. This is not true, it is illegal.” An employer contributing to such a fund could, for instance, encounter risk if the fund’s details are withheld or the fund is rendered non-complying if the employer does not contribute the minimum SG amount within the 7-day time frame.

Accordingly, employers may be exposed to penalties and interest where SG is not received on time, even when the reason for the delay is outside the employer’s control.

Large APRA funds are subject to strict processing requirements, including allocating SG within 3-business days and, if that fails, returning the SG within the same 3-business day period. However, SMSFs have up to 28 days to allocate contributions and do not have to reject a contribution. Thus, an employer who pays a contribution to an SMSF should not expect a contribution to be returned. Therefore, the risk that the employee’s SMSF may have contravened the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) (SISA) falls on the employer who may have to make contributions to a complying fund to minimise the SG shortfall, penalties and interest that may otherwise arise.

Under PDS, employers generate contribution data via their payroll systems, transmit that data through SuperStream, transfer contributions via the New Payments Platform (NPP), and ensure the contribution is received and validated within 7-business days. There are a number of potential risk points and employers remain responsible for satisfying their SG obligations even if the reason for a delay is completely outside of their control.

NPP is a 24/7 fast payment system that should enable near real-time transactions between bank accounts.

Note, however, that an employer contributing to an SMSF where there is a related party relationship (eg, between the employer and SMSF or an SMSF member), is not required to use SuperStream and may instead contribute via an electronic funds transfer or other method. Despite this ‘carve out’ from SuperStream for SMSFs, many related party employers may still rely on SuperStream and the NPP to keep their payroll affairs more streamlined moving into PDS.

Given the additional risks thrust on employers who are required to contribute to an employee’s SMSF, the employers can consider including an indemnity clause in the employment contract to protect the employer where they pay SG on time, but the contribution is not received by the SMSF on time due to the SMSF trustee’s fault. Naturally, this would not displace the employer’s statutory obligations but provides a contractual claim against the employee.

SMSF trustee compliance

SMSF trustees must also ensure they comply with all PDS and SuperStream changes, this includes:

ensuring the SMSF’s bank account is NPP compliant; and
ensuring they are registered for, and continue to maintain an active electronic service address (ESA).

The ESA is how SuperStream contribution messages are delivered to an SMSF, usually through an administrator or messaging provider.

If the above criteria are not satisfied, it may only become apparent when a contribution is rejected or delayed, exposing the employer to an SG shortfall and potentially a range of other penalties, despite having acted on time.

Employer due diligence obligations

Employers should adopt a proactive approach to PDS especially with managing the additional risk associated with employee SMSFs, including:

verifying SMSF details via Super Fund Lookup at least annually or more frequently if there are any concerns about their employees’ SMSFs;
obtaining a written compliance certificate from each SMSF trustee at least annually; and
undertaking a member verification service check to confirm each employee’s details, including the name of their chosen fund and it’s unique superannuation identifier.

However, an employer cannot generally rely on this information if there is a related party relationship and there is reasonable belief that a contravention of SISA has occurred.

However, if there is:

no related party relationship;
no knowledge of any contravention; and
a written compliance certificate from the SMSF trustee has been received by the employer,

the contribution should be accepted as an eligible contribution under the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth).

As you can see, employers are made responsible for many things outside their control under PDS and the SGAA. Accordingly, employers are now required to monitor their employees’ SMSFs closely to minimise their risk.

Further, given the strict time frames and significant penalties that can be imposed, employers should have the employees’ stapled and default fund details on hand (see here). This provides the employer with a backup option to satisfy their SG obligation where issues arise with the employee’s SMSF.

Closing comments

There is increased risk for employers when paying SG to an SMSF. In particular, employers remain liable for late SG payments despite relying on SMSF trustees, systems and third-party providers for the SG payment to be received on time.

Employers should work with trustees to ensure the SMSF complies with the PDS requirements and should begin reviewing systems, verifying data, and implementing processes well before 1 July 2026 to mitigate the risk of non-compliance and significant penalties.

Naturally, DBA Lawyers would be pleased to assist.

Top Navigation

Navigation

Payday Super and SMSFs

Employer risk when dealing with SMSFs

SMSF trustee compliance

Employer due diligence obligations

Closing comments

Related articles/webinars: