The recent New South Wales Supreme Court decision of G v G (No. 2) [2020] NSWSC 818 (G v G) provides important guidance on the limitations that apply to trustees and managers of protected estates in dealing with superannuation investments, including in relation to making super contributions and binding death benefit nominations (‘BDBNs’). In this [read more]
![An important reminder when drafting deeds: Wilstead No. 5 Pty Ltd v Smyth [2020] VSC 651](https://www.dbalawyers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/An-important-reminder-when-drafting-deeds-Wilstead-No-5-Pty-Ltd-v-Smyth-2020-VSC-651-200x200.jpg "An important reminder when drafting deeds: Wilstead No. 5 Pty Ltd v Smyth [2020] VSC 651")
The recent Victorian Supreme Court decision of Wilstead No. 5 Pty Ltd v Smyth [2020] VSC 651 serves as an important reminder when drafting SMSF deeds. These days many non-lawyers — such as accountants and financial planners — draft deeds by populating websites that instantly generate deeds with no lawyer review or sign off. We [read more]
![An important reminder on excess contributions: Purcell and Commissioner of Taxation [2020] AATA 4235](https://www.dbalawyers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/An-important-reminder-on-excess-contributions-Purcell-and-Commissioner-of-Taxation-2020-AATA-4235-200x200.jpg "An important reminder on excess contributions: Purcell and Commissioner of Taxation [2020] AATA 4235")
The recent AAT decision of Purcell and Commissioner of Taxation [2020] AATA 4235 serves as an important reminder when making superannuation contributions. Facts For the full decision, see http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/AATA//2020/4235.html. A summary of the fact is as follows. The AAT indicated that during the financial year ended 30 June 2018, Mrs Purcell had a non-concessional contributions [read more]
![Sutton v NRS(J) Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 826: Lessons for managing lost trust deeds](https://www.dbalawyers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Lessons-for-managing-lost-trust-deeds-200x200.jpg "Sutton v NRS(J) Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 826: Lessons for managing lost trust deeds")
The recent decision of Sutton v NRS(J) Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 826 highlights the importance of having original executed copies of all constituent trust documents. It has tremendous relevance for SMSFs. Facts The facts of the case were as follows: In 17 August 1972, a discretionary trust (‘Trust’) was established for the benefit of the [read more]
The Victorian Court of Appeal recently handed down Wareham v Marsella [2020] VSCA 92. This judgement represents the appeal of Marsella v Wareham (No 2) [2019] VSC 65. You can read our article about Wareham v Marsella here. Many have questioned why the outcome in Wareham v Marsella is so different to Katz v Grossman [read more]
Introduction The Victorian Court of Appeal recently handed down Wareham v Marsella [2020] VSCA 92. This judgement represents the appeal of Marsella v Wareham (No 2) [2019] VSC 65. In brief, the appeal was dismissed. The appeal judgement illustrates that trustees (including SMSF trustees) are held to very high standards, and when performing their duties, [read more]
The recent case of Burgess v Burgess [2018] WASC 279 (‘Burgess’) continues a line of cases that consider the conflict that arises where a person acts as executor of a deceased estate while also receiving superannuation death benefits in their personal capacity. [read more]
The decision in Re Marsella [2019] VSC 65 highlights the importance of trustees of SMSFs exercising their discretion to pay death benefits in good faith, with real and genuine consideration and in accordance with the purpose for which their power was conferred. [read more]
By: Daniel Butler, Director ([email protected]), DBA Lawyers The decision of D18-19\002 is what we understand to be the first decision of a court or tribunal requiring a trustee of a superannuation fund to refund fees debited to a member and paid to financial advisers who did not provide any services to the member. Background The [read more]
By: Daniel Butler, Director ([email protected]) and Bryce Figot, Special Counsel ([email protected]), DBA Lawyers The recent decision by the Supreme Court of Queensland in the case of Re Narumon Pty Ltd [2018] QSC 185 (‘Narumon’) again confirms the importance of having a quality SMSF document supplier. More specifically, it shows how poorly drafted binding death benefit nomination [read more]
